While I wouldn't agree that the USA is an "indispensible nation" or a "precondition for human progress" (humility, like irony, not being a British trait that transferred after 1776) I think the first few paragraphs of this page from The Daily Brew make worthwhile reading.
But it's worth remembering that most of the rest of the world still thinks Bush's victory four years ago was a scandal, no matter what the rules of the "electoral college" system. The world is waiting with baited breath and can't wait for this idiot to be shown the door.
The Daily Brew
� May 8, 2004
We Are All Wearing The Blue Dress Now
Whether Republicans like it or not, if George Bush is elected in the fall, the entire world will view the election as American approval of the torture and sexual humiliation of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison. It might not be fair, it might not be reasonable, but it is nevertheless reality. Apologies, prosecutions, firings and courts martial will not be enough to expunge the stain this scandal has placed on the honor of the United States. The pictures are simply too graphic. The abuses are simply too horrible. If George Bush is elected President, the entire world will view the election, at a minimum, as tacit approval of these events.
This election will thus no longer merely determine the Presidency. This election is now much larger than the office. The United State�s place in the family of nations is now on the ballot. This election will determine whether the United States will ever again have any standing or moral authority in the rest of the world. The United States cannot simultaneously stand against depraved sexual torture and the wanton abuse of human rights, while electing the commander in chief upon whose watch these events occurred. The seven hundred thousand or so viewers of Fox News may be able to rationalize such cognitive dissonance; the six billion people who make up the remainder of the world will not.
The stakes are thus immeasurable. For better or for worse, a strong, just and moral United States is not simply a luxury. Instead, it has become a precondition for human progress. For better or for worse, the United States has become the indispensable nation. Our economic, technological, and military position in the world insures that we will remain as such for the foreseeable future. The only question that remains, therefore, is whether the United States will have a moral authority on par with our economic and military dominance. That question will be answered in the fall. The election will determine whether America can ever again be seen as a shining city on a hill, a beacon of hope and freedom the illuminates the entire globe. Sadly, the election of George Bush will mean that the United States will instead be viewed as a rat hole prison in Iraq, where nude prisoners were bound together, tortured with hot chemicals, and beaten to death.
Vote carefully, my fellow Americans.
Visual Communication: From Theory to Practice
(Winner of 'Best Higher Education Title' at the British Book Awards 2006)
by Jonathan Baldwin and Lucienne Roberts
More Than A Name: An introduction to branding
by Melissa Davis and Jonathan Baldwin
3 comments:
Johnathan:
Your comments seem to assume that the US is not that big of a deal, globally speaking. I suspect you do so because you assume, a priori, the existence of a well behaved United States. Change that assumption, and it becomes blindingly obvious how incorrect you are. For example, if the United States were to start setting off tactical nuclear weapons in the middle east, would it change your view of just how "indispensible" the United States is to peace around the rest of the world? Armed to the teeth with military bases, and thus the ability to project force, spanning the globe, at a minimum, a well behaved United States is obviously a "precondition for human progress."
I don't assume the USA is anything of the sort! But suggesting their military might makes them a precondition for human progress is like saying the playground bully is a precondition for peaceful education. It doesn't follow.
It's like the argument that guns don't lead to gun violence - the facts speak for themselves there!
Having a gun totin' oil baron as a president has hardly made the world a safer place.
If the rest of the world chose one day to ignore the USA, I think we'd get along just fine.
I'd miss the Simpsons, though...
Post a Comment